🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.